During this year’s Google I/O conference, Google made many big announcements regarding its AI chatbot, Google Bard, establishing it as an important player in the chatbot sector. Bard, which is available in over 180 countries, was particularly designed by Google to compete with OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Microsoft’s GPT-4 linked with Bing.
Table of Contents
Bard is based on PaLM 2, an advanced AI model developed by Google in February. Google CEO Sundar Pichai stated that one of the PaLM 2 variants is light enough to run on smartphones.
You might also like
Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian told Reuters that their company is in the midst of enrolling clients such as Deutsche Bank AG and Uber Technologies Inc for testing reasons. These firms will analyze and appraise the effectiveness of Google’s latest technologies.
Since it was launched, Bard has drawn the attention of tech enthusiasts and is regarded as a serious challenger to ChatGPT. Google has incorporated some new capabilities to Bard to improve the user experience and overcome the restrictions of ChatGPT.
If you want to know more about google I/O 2023 Read.
Compare Google Bard and ChatGPT
ChatGPT and Bard are AI chatbot models that have different characteristics. ChatGPT and Bard both provide unique features. Understanding the differences can help you to select the best chatbot for your use case.
| Features | Google Bard | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Web access | Bard has internet access and can summarize web pages by sharing the link. | ChatGPT lacks internet connectivity and requires manual copy-pasting of content. |
| Image Prompts | Bard can utilize images as prompts for interactions. | Image prompts are not supported in ChatGPT. |
| Coding Support | Bard offers assistance in over 20 programming languages. | ChatGPT has coding capabilities but may be less comprehensive. |
| Integration with Gmail | Bard can export results to Gmail and Docs for easy sharing. | No specific integration mentioned with Gmail for ChatGPT. |
| Toxicity | Bard exhibits some level of toxicity, particularly in certain languages. | No specific information provided about toxicity in ChatGPT. |
| Reasoning Performance | PaLM 2, the underlying model for Bard, performs similarly to or better than GPT-4 in reasoning tasks. | No specific information provided about ChatGPT’s performance in reasoning tasks. |
| Coding Performance | PaLM 2, the underlying model for Bard, requires multiple attempts and additional coding tokens to achieve good performance in coding tasks. | ChatGPT has coding capabilities but may have limitations in coding tasks. |
To get all its features in details contained reading. and you can also try Google Bard today to enjoy its new features!
Web Access
In comparison to ChatGPT, one significant feature of Bard is its direct internet connectivity. While ChatGPT’s commercial version, ChatGPT Plus, requires plugins to access the internet, Bard can use the power of the internet to deliver thorough and informative replies.
Bard can provide real-time information, acquire the most recent news, and react to requests with up-to-date data by exploiting its internet connectivity. When compared to ChatGPT, this provides Bard an advantage in terms of getting current and relevant information.
However, it’s important to note that Bard is still in its early stages, and there may be times when the chatbot’s information is incorrect or possibly offensive.
In a related development, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stated in a tweet that they want to include internet plugins and code execution plugins into ChatGPT. This suggests that OpenAI is actively looking at methods to improve ChatGPT’s capabilities and maybe overcome the internet connection gap between ChatGPT and Bard.
Image generating
Another distinguishing feature of Bard over both the premium and free versions of ChatGPT is its ability to produce graphics as answers. During the event, Google revealed that Bard will provide AI picture production capabilities via connection with Adobe Firefly. This connection improves the conversation’s visual element, allowing users to obtain more contextually rich information.
Bard can give visual representations to supplement its written replies by utilizing this functionality. This graphic feature adds depth and clarity to the discussion, improving the user experience overall. It enables consumers to have a more thorough comprehension of the information being provided.
ChatGPT does not have image generating capabilities. While ChatGPT excels at text-based conversations, the combination of Bard with Adobe Firefly adds another level to the dialogue, making it more engaging and visually instructive.
Coding Capabilities
Bard outperforms ChatGPT in terms of coding support, with assistance in over 20 programming languages. C++, Python, Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, and more languages are supported. Bard’s coding features include code creation, explanation, and debugging, making it an invaluable tool for programmers.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, has coding ability because it has been educated in a variety of coding languages such as Python, JavaScript, C++, C#, Java, Ruby, PHP, Go, Swift, TypeScript, SQL, and Shell. While ChatGPT can answer code-related questions, it may not be as thorough or specialized as Bard in providing coding support.
However, it’s important to note that OpenAI’s Codex, a distinct AI model created exclusively for coding, may be more suited for handling extra coding-related tasks than ChatGPT. While ChatGPT excels at natural language interpretation, Codex has been especially designed for coding-related activities and may offer more sophisticated coding help.
Voice Prompt
Bard goes beyond ChatGPT in terms of voice prompts, providing a better user experience by allowing interactions by voice input. This feature allows users to interact with the chatbot using their voice, which is especially beneficial when multitasking or typing is not practicable or comfortable. By delivering voice interaction features, Bard obtains a competitive edge over its competitors by giving customers with a more flexible and hands-free method to obtaining replies and engaging in discussions.
Gmail Integration
In addition to its other benefits, Bard provides easy connection with Gmail, which is a significant benefit. With over 2 billion people using Gmail, the option to have an AI chatbot like Bard immediately within the email service offers up new possibilities for email exchanges and has the potential to improve the entire user experience.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, is being incorporated into Microsoft’s suite of business software, Microsoft 365. ChatGPT is being integrated into major Microsoft apps such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook (Microsoft’s counterpart of Gmail). ChatGPT’s connection with Microsoft applications is made possible by the use of plugins, which allow users to utilize the chatbot’s capabilities directly within these productivity tools.
Users may benefit from ChatGPT’s capabilities and help while working on various documents and tasks inside the Microsoft ecosystem, including their counterpart to Gmail, Outlook, by integrating it into Microsoft 365. This connection allows users to utilize the chatbot’s functionality from within familiar Microsoft software settings.
Image Prompts
Bard has a fantastic feature that allows users to use images as prompts. Users can take or scan images and utilize them as input while interacting with Bard by using technologies such as Google Lens. This feature allows viewers to ask questions or seek advice on the image’s content. Users, for example, can query about comparable vacation places to those displayed in another image, as well as their historical and cultural relevance. The ability to utilize images as prompts provides a new layer to conversations with AI chatbots, extending engagement and prompt generation options.
GPT-4, on the other hand, promises to be a big multimodal model capable of receiving image and text inputs and creating text outputs. However, as of the date of publication, the option to use image inputs has not been included, even in the premium version of GPT-4. This suggests that, while GPT-4 has the potential for multimodal interactions, the technology to interpret and respond to images has yet to be built.
Export Responses
Another interesting aspect of Bard is its ability to instantly export results to Gmail and Docs, allowing users to rapidly share created material with others. This feature facilitates information exchange and makes drafting emails or generating documents more convenient and efficient.
In contrast, OpenAI has included a comparable export option to their platform’s settings. Users can export their account information and discussions, which will be emailed to their registered email address as a downloadable file. However, it is stated that the processing of this export may take some time, implying that the exported data may be delayed.
While both Bard and OpenAI include export choices, Bard’s seamless interface with Gmail and Docs allows for rapid sharing and collaboration, resulting in a more streamlined and efficient workflow for users.
